Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1904 days newer than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 85 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 43% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 136 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$515.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $515.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |