Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 3325 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5645 - 276 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-9980HK
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
