Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 775 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5620 - 382 vs 367 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 77 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
382
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |