Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3773 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5620 - 730 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
730
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |