Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3751 days newer than Xeon E5530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 14% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5530 - 667 vs 587 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5530 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
667
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Gainestown | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |