Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 4049 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5520 - 429 vs 366 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5520 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
429
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Gainestown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |