Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1603 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 44 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 8% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 229 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $269.99 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77122 minutes ago
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |