Buy on Amazon
$1,595.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 724 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 44 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 113 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $133.93 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76876 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-9400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores 2. 90 GHz up to 4. 10 GHz Turbo LGA1151 300 Series 65W Processors BX80684I59400
Buy for $133.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-9400
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 6 |
44 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
