Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700HX outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700HX is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700HX - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700HX
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-14700HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1024
40.65105200476379%
Multi-Core
7422
55.06751743582134%
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 16 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.5 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
