Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2698 v3 outperforms Core i5-5350U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2698 v3 is 174 days older than Core i5-5350U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-5350U - 199 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 15 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
