Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600 - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 332 vs 305 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1024
42.018875666803446%
Multi-Core
7422
59.75845410628019%
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
