Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840U - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
- Performs up to 22% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 131 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 28 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 8840U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1024
40.894568690095845%
Multi-Core
7422
84.68735737106344%
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
