Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $3226
Availability
MSRP in USD: $3226
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1319 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 538 vs 511 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 105 vs 135 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
538
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2698 v3 or Ryzen 7 2700X
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
199 FPS
$7.04/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
