Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 358 days older than Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G4400 - 118 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $128.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
64.49814126394052%
Multi-Core
1184
15.884089079688756%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |