Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 231 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1076
36.18022864828514%
Multi-Core
7454
36.996227913440535%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |