Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700 - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 192 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$217.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $217.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |