Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 28 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 95 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |