Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v3 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v3 is 281 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Performs up to 30% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1820 - 195 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 53 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
45.63197026022305%
Multi-Core
825
11.067883015830427%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |