Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2405 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10875H - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 133 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
