Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 1705 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-430M - 102 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-430M - 36 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-430M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-430M |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Arrandale |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
