Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 2201 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 131 vs 127 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |