Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 737 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron B830 - 201 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
