Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 174 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 21% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 3205U - 123 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron 3205U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell E | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
