Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 1763 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 3400G - 290 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 36 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
287
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell E | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 4 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |