Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 70% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 747 vs 440 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
747
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$344.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $344.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |