Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
422
26.691967109424414%
Multi-Core
3793
54.10841654778887%
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
