Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5257U outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5257U is 1090 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5257U
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2690 - 122 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 28 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2690
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-5257U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i5-5257U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris 6100 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
