Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2690 - 183 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 105 vs 135 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |