Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2690 - 217 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.93
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |