Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1023 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 174 vs 169 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |