Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5350U outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5350U is 546 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-5350U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
