Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4430 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4430 is 91 days older than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4430 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4430
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-4430
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4430 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
