Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 3434 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 270 vs 214 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
583
25.205361003026372%
Multi-Core
4085
45.26315789473684%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
