Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 135 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
