Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 160 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 28 vs 20 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
20 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |