Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 25% better in F1 23 than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 240 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 65 vs 160 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1030
61.45584725536993%
Multi-Core
6832
81.08236411108474%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |