Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2141
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2141
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2687W v3 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2687W v3 is 848 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3930T - 155 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 35 vs 160 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
53.20388349514563%
Multi-Core
948
13.875878220140514%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 160 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.