Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 8640U is 3748 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 8640U - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 149 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 28 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 8640U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
624
25.141015310233684%
Multi-Core
4022
45.8661192838408%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
