Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 107 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$350
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |