Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1165G7 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1165G7 is 3102 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-1165G7 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2680 - 269 vs 226 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-1165G7
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i7-1165G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
