Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1822 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2680 - 198 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |