Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1302 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60974 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
980
74.13010590015129%
Multi-Core
6528
100%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |