Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1513 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-760 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |