Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1471 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 31% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-560 - 306 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 73 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
45.20408163265306%
Multi-Core
932
14.276960784313724%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |