Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 120 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 14% better in New World than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 121 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |