Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 9 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 115 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 225 vs 224 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 130 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
