Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 49% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 183 vs 123 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
559
23.78723404255319%
Multi-Core
3843
31.489675516224192%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
