Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 157 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 55 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
559
20.468692786525082%
Multi-Core
3843
24.40619839959355%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
