Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7840HS is 3434 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
- Performs up to 118% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 166 vs 76 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
559
23.408710217755445%
Multi-Core
3843
34.343163538873995%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
