Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1583 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 200 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
712
51.66908563134979%
Multi-Core
1527
31.588746379809677%
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |